• Home
  • About
  • PPACA Severability Series

walshslaw

perspectives on law, from Richmond VA

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« From Roper to Rosie to . . .
The Catholic Bishops in the Rehnquist Court: Track Record as Amicus Curiae »

Justice Brennan and Justice White from the Catholic Bishops’ point of view

February 29, 2012 by Kevin C. Walsh

During his time on the Rehnquist Court, Justice Brennan voted in seven cases in which the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (the “USCCB” or “Bishops’ Conference”) filed an amicus curiae brief. He voted for the party supported by the Bishops’ Conference in three out of those seven cases. By contrast, during his time on the Rehnquist Court, Justice White voted in ten cases in which the USCCB filed an amicus curiae brief (the same seven as Justice Brennan, plus three more). He voted for the party support by the Bishops’ Conference in all ten of those cases.

The low level of agreement between Justice Brennan and the Bishops’ Conference is notable given that Justice Brennan was the last beneficiary of a so-called “Catholic seat” on the Supreme Court.  And Justice Brennan’s voting pattern presents an interesting contrast with Justice White’s.  The contrast is noteworthy because President Kennedy appointed White. As the country’s first (and thus far only) Catholic President, Kennedy could not politically afford to nominate a Catholic to the Supreme Court.  By contrast, Brennan’s Catholicism was an important factor in making him an attractive nominee for Eisenhower.  Thus, one reason that Brennan was appointed is that he was a Catholic, while one reason White was appointed is that he was not a Catholic.  Yet White ended up consistently voting with the Catholic bishops on the Rehnquist Court, while Justice Brennan had one of the lowest rates of agreement during the same time period.

There were five other Justices who voted in all ten cases in which the Bishops’ Conference filed an amicus curiae brief and in which Justice White voted: Chief Justice Rehnquist, Justice Blackmun, Justice Stevens, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Scalia. Rehnquist and Scalia joined White in voting for the party supported by the Bishops’ Conference in all ten of these cases. Justice O’Connor voted for that party in eight out of those ten cases, Justice Stevens in three, and Justice Blackmun in two. In the first several years of the Rehnquist Court, then, the three Justices with the best track record from the point of view of the Bishops’ Conference consisted of two Protestants (Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice White) and one Catholic (Justice Scalia).

[Cross-posted at CLR Forum]

About these ads

Share this:

  • Share
  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google +1
  • Digg
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like Loading...

Posted in Catholic, Law | Tagged amicus curiae, Brennan, Catholic bishops, Rehnquist, Rehnquist Court, Scalia, USCCB, White |

  • Twitter Feed

    • John Marshall's politic reception of a work on political economy wp.me/pgZJ1-wS 3 weeks ago
    Follow @kevincwalsh
  • Archives

    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
  • Categories

    • Catholic
    • Fourth Circuit
    • Law
    • News
  • Pages

    • About
    • PPACA Severability Series
  • Popular Tags

    ACA ACCA Affordable Care Act Agee Anti-Injunction Act class action conspiracy Davis Diaz Duncan en banc facial challenge First Amendment Floyd Fourth Amendment Fourth Circuit Gregory Hamilton HCR healthcare health care reform healthcare reform HHS individual mandate jurisdiction Keenan Keith King Motz Niemeyer RFRA Richmond Scalia sentencing severability Shedd Sixth Circuit standing Supreme Court Third Circuit Traxler Virginia Virginia v. Sebelius Wilkinson Wynn

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 244 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: